Chapters 1, 2, and the beginnings of 3 are comprehensive and well researched. You have shown to the reader that you understand the significance and importance of multimedia for community and how your artifact will contribute to the online experience of your chosen target group. It is also well written with few or no grammar and spelling errors. It is also well referenced and you have used the APA style guides correctly.

Chapter 1 distinctly states the purpose and rational of using multimedia for community. You do NOT begin to define your project. You do, HOWEVER, in the chapter state (very briefly) what your project will be about, and then refer the reader to the Concept Document located in the Appendix.

Chapter 2 is a comprehensive review of the secondary literature associated with community multimedia. You have reviewed the literature and managed to understand what is relevant without having to reference everything that you've read. This chapter is well written and it is obvious that the words are your own and that you understand what you've written. You have also properly referenced all material.

Chapter 3 has been started and the reviews/competitive analysis of other online community experiences have been summarized and discussed. You have begun the process of explaining your artifact and how it fits in with the information/purpose stated in Chapter 1 and with the review of the secondary literature in Chapter 2.

Reference page is included and the layout and style are according to the APA manual.

Appendix are attached. At this point, these would include your Concept Document, Functional Specification and Node Map.

Chapters 1, 2, and the beginnings of 3 are somewhat lacking in writing standards and research. You have shown to the reader that you understand some of the significance and importance of community multimedia and how your artifact will contribute to the experience of your chosen target group, but you've not been as clear as you should. You have some writing, grammar and spelling errors. You have made some mistakes in referencing and you have not used the APA style guides correctly.

Chapter 1 states the purpose and rational of using multimedia for community, but it is lacking and somewhat confusing. You also make the common error of beginning to discus your project and define the problem according to the brief.

Chapter 2 is a review of the secondary literature associated with community multimedia. You have reviewed the literature but it's not apparent that you understand what is relevant. You are referencing everything that you've read without realizing what is relevant. This chapter has some writing problems and it is obvious that you don't really understand what you've written. You have also not properly referenced all material.

Chapter 3 has been started and the reviews of other community media may have been included, but you've included everything, not just the information that relates to your own project. You have begun the process of explaining your artifact and how it fits in with the information/purpose stated in Chapter 1 and with the review of the secondary literature in Chapter 2, but the reader is unclear how this relates to your artifact.

Reference page is included but the layout and style are not completely according to the APA manual.

Appendix are not necessarily attached. At this point, these should include your Concept Document and Node Map.

Chapters 1, 2, and the beginnings of 3 are lacking in writing standards and research. You haven't shown to the reader that you understand some of the significance and importance of community multimedia and how your artifact will contribute to the experience of your chosen target group. You have many writing, grammar and spelling errors. You have made many mistakes in referencing and you have not used the APA style guides correctly.

Chapter 1 doesn't state the purpose and rational of using community, and is lacking and very confusing.

Chapter 2 is a poor review of the secondary literature associated with community multimedia. You have not reviewed the literature and it's apparent that you do not understand what is relevant. This chapter has many writing problems and it is obvious that you don't understand what you've written. You have also not properly referenced the material.

Chapter 3 has not been started and the reviews of other community media are not included, You have not begun the process of explaining your artifact and how it fits in with the information/purpose stated in Chapter 1 and with the review of the secondary literature in Chapter 2.

Reference page is not included.

Appendixes are not attached. At this point, these should include your Concept Document and Node Map.